In an op-ed for The Atlantic, law professor Dawinder S. Sidhu discusses an upcoming case this term, Holt v. Hobbs, which involves the question of whether Arkansas’ Department of Corrections’ grooming regulations violate Holt’s religious freedom.  Sidhu asserts that this case should begin and end with Hobby Lobby.  Yet, Professor Sidhu ignores one key distinguishing factor: here, unlike … Continue reading →